[OT] LLVM Community Code of Conduct

[Charles Pritchard via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 10:24:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 10/15/15 11:11 AM, Kagamin wrote:
>> On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 06:36:32 UTC, logicchains 
>> wrote:
>>> Even if it's not entirely logical, all these unfinished 
>>> aspects can
>>> add up to produce a less positive aesthetic impression of the 
>>> language
...
> I would agree that we're less polished than Go and other 
> languages. This is something we need to work on - just show the 
> world a completely defined and implemented language. -- Andrei

I'd like to see a roadmap, covering some of the pain points that 
logicchains brought up. It'd be nice to look at it, and get the 
impression that those issues will be resolved within an estimated 
time period; mainly around GC and ref.