dmd codegen improvements

[Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d]

On 2 Sep 2015 9:05 pm, "Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d" <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/29/2015 1:13 PM, Ola Fosheim Grostad wrote:
>>
>> But the net effect of maintaining 3 different backends is sending
signals that
>> the project lacks direction and priorities.
>
>
> Back when there was only 1 compiler, people complained about that, saying
it signaled lack of reliable support.
>

Is this argument still being used?

This is the best example of double standards that outside reviewers give
about the core D maintainers.

In any other language, you'd call it freedom of choice (devil's advocate:
the fact that there are dozens of C++ compilers has a negative impact on
usage and adoption).

Iain.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20150902/e17ea591/attachment.html>