dmd codegen improvements

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 3 September 2015 at 09:56:55 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
Grøstad wrote:
> On Thursday, 3 September 2015 at 06:18:54 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> It is twice as slow as native. That's far from allowing 
>> generation of pure assembly.
>
> It is translatable to pure assembly, addressing is modulo heap 
> size. Performance is a different issue since it does not 
> provide SIMD yet.

SIMD is not even remotely close to explaining the perf difference.