dmd codegen improvements

[Manu via Digitalmars-d]

Actually, in the point cloud on the web demo I've linked before, which is
EXTREMELY compute intensive code, we experience a barely measurable loss in
performance between pnacl and native code. 20% loss would be huge, but we
see nothing like that, probably within 5% is closer to our experience.
On 5 Sep 2015 3:11 am, "deadalnix via Digitalmars-d" <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Friday, 4 September 2015 at 14:56:48 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
>
>> On Friday, 4 September 2015 at 14:45:39 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
>>
>>> Because it has the path of least resistance. It's still a poor
>>> technology that is just treating the symptoms.
>>>
>>
>> pnacl/pepper is not good either, they are both poor technologies.
>>
>>
> Statement do not makes arguements. pNaCl is portable, take only a 20% hit
> compared to pure native and is compact to send through the wire.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20150905/b1b6190b/attachment.html>