Can std.conv.toImpl please be deprecated
Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Apr 17 15:31:00 PDT 2016
On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 05:04:46 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that toImpl being public is an oversight. The
> name itself implies that it should be private. I seriously
> doubt any user code actually calls toImpl directly... shouldn't
> it be just a matter of marking it private instead? Do we
> really need to go through a deprecation cycle for this?
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/4208
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list