stc.experimental.ndslice -> sci.ndslice

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On 04/18/2016 07:13 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 06:10:34 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
>> We plan to add a set of numeric packages and this would be real pain
>> if they would be one-by-one moved from experimental to stable std. So
>> sci.* should be considered as experimental during few years.
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/4207
> 
> As I have said many times on both IRC and NG, I would prefer to have
> `stdx` instead of ridiculously long (4x) `std.experimental`. Then you
> would have a nice package named `stdx.sci`.
> 
> PS. this is not my "invention" - Java community has `javax` for similar
> (but different, as nothing in javax is experimental) purpose!

Java is commonly mentioned as example of experimental package concept
that didn't work at all.