Multiple return value as requirements for safety and performance
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Dec 20 09:28:49 PST 2016
On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 17:15:53 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
>
> Are they already CTFEable? I have not seen an anounce, sorry
They have been for years now.
Of course only pointers from a CTFE context are valid at ctfe.
The new engine will support them as well, (as it will eventually
support everything with the exception of 80bit reals)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list