Multiple return value as requirements for safety and performance

Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Dec 20 09:28:49 PST 2016


On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 17:15:53 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko 
wrote:
>
> Are they already CTFEable? I have not seen an anounce, sorry

They have been for years now.
Of course only pointers from a CTFE context are valid at ctfe.

The new engine will support them as well, (as it will eventually 
support everything with the exception of 80bit reals)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list