DIP83

[rsw0x via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 15 January 2016 at 11:58:19 UTC, Márcio Martins wrote:
> On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 14:28:05 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> [...]
>
> True that. I think it's great to keep evolving the language and 
> making it better, on the other hand, if D is to get serious 
> adoption, then everything, especially the basics like 
> debuggability, quality of codegen and compiler bugs will need 
> to be solid. D as a language is already powerful enough to 
> thrash the competition, this is why we love it. But the reason 
> it's experiencing slow adoption, is because of tooling and 
> general implementation quality, and the lower threshold of 
> tolerance from the general population.

I think what he was pointing out is that many D features are 
currently barely functioning or not working and adding more 
features is just a waste of time.