DIP83

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 03:00:33 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
> On Friday, 15 January 2016 at 11:58:19 UTC, Márcio Martins 
> wrote:
>> On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 14:28:05 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> True that. I think it's great to keep evolving the language 
>> and making it better, on the other hand, if D is to get 
>> serious adoption, then everything, especially the basics like 
>> debuggability, quality of codegen and compiler bugs will need 
>> to be solid. D as a language is already powerful enough to 
>> thrash the competition, this is why we love it. But the reason 
>> it's experiencing slow adoption, is because of tooling and 
>> general implementation quality, and the lower threshold of 
>> tolerance from the general population.
>
> I think what he was pointing out is that many D features are 
> currently barely functioning or not working and adding more 
> features is just a waste of time.

Yes, that was the larger point.