rval->ref const(T), implicit conversions
tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jan 19 10:38:25 PST 2016
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 18:28:28 UTC, bitwise wrote:
> It's not that I don't understand, I just don't care to convince
> YOU that I do.
>
> Bit
So because you "don't care" -> you argue with me about what my
own code does.
Because you DO "understand" -> you give a point-by-point
criticism that's completely wrong.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list