rval->ref const(T), implicit conversions

tsbockman via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jan 19 10:38:25 PST 2016


On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 18:28:28 UTC, bitwise wrote:
> It's not that I don't understand, I just don't care to convince 
> YOU that I do.
>
>     Bit

So because you "don't care" -> you argue with me about what my 
own code does.
Because you DO "understand" -> you give a point-by-point 
criticism that's completely wrong.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list