C++17

Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jan 26 11:02:54 PST 2016


On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 18:57:45 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> I don't think it is desirable. I do think we should focus on 
> having GC.malloc/GC.free have the same level of perfs than 
> malloc/free, which is very doable.

Does this mean that you have given up on D getting an ownership 
mechanism?


> Now as to when, well, I'm waiting for your PR.

Not sure what you mean?



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list