C++17

[rsw0x via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 19:02:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 18:57:45 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> I don't think it is desirable. I do think we should focus on 
>> having GC.malloc/GC.free have the same level of perfs than 
>> malloc/free, which is very doable.
>
> Does this mean that you have given up on D getting an ownership 
> mechanism?

There doesn't seem to be much work towards this and it doesn't 
appear to be a high priority issue. Things like catching C++ 
exceptions seem to be far higher up on the priority list than a 
defined memory model or ownership mechanics.
I see C++17 and think of why I should keep using D when C++ is 
aping a lot of its best features.