Vision for the D language - stabilizing complexity?
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jul 14 05:38:44 PDT 2016
On Thursday, 14 July 2016 at 12:12:34 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
> I don't have time for a long rant on this... But if you are
> designing a truly new langauge (and D isn't), then you create
> prototypes, then you build a framework that is suitable for
> evolutionary design, then you spec it, then you try to prove it
> sound, then you implement it then you trash it, and redesign it
> and write a new spec.
What's the reason to implement what can't work even for you alone?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list