Does a Interpretation-Engine fit in phobos ?

[Wyatt via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 10:36:44 UTC, qznc wrote:
> Ok, seriously, it sounds like an awesome feat, but I don't 
> think it is necessary to put it into Phobos. First, a dub 
> package, please.

Agree.  Does Java even have something like that?  That's sort of 
the exemplar for "hopelessly overdone standard library".

> Off-topic: Is it possible/feasible/desirable to let dmd use dub 
> packages?

DMD shouldn't have to download things from the public internet to 
do its job.

> I guess it would make sense to extract parts of dmd into dub 
> packages. As a next step, dmd could use those packages instead 
> of duplicating code.

Does it?  Which parts?  I'm afraid I don't see the benefit.

-Wyatt