[r/cpp] Why I am not happy with C++17

[Minas Mina via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 8 March 2016 at 17:31:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 March 2016 at 15:54:46 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky 
> wrote:
>> This more or less means that we (as in D enthusiasts) have 
>> some more time to carve up some "market" share. Till C++20 I 
>> guess.
>
> Yes, but they got in parallelism ISO/IEC 29124:2010 and file 
> system support.

I honestly don't care about those. Boost has them. Modules are 
far more important for me.