ISO/IEC standard?

[Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d]

On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 21:18 +0000, Rusty via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> […]
> 
> Why do people feel it is risky to develop a large project in D 
> but not in C++?
> 
Risk aversion and avoidance, conservatism, size of extant installed
base of application in the programming language, lack of programmer
pool, lack of thinking, "do what we did last time" attitude, sometimes
lack of bindings to dependencies, lack of sizable training content,
lack of courses in training company portfolio, blind panic about
garbage collection, lack of ambition, fear of being different,
assumption that you have to do things in C but C++ is acceptable.

I think that main training companies offer C, C++, Go, and even Rust
training but not D training is actually a very big issue.

[…]

--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20160517/0670a8fe/attachment-0001.sig>