Best Lua integration?

[Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 17 November 2016 at 06:33:06 UTC, Kim wrote:

>
> I think I will go for the more C-like binding of DerelictLua; I 
> am fine for the shared libraries binding as I don't need static 
> bindings, but I guess that could be added without too much 
> effort?

Some of the Derelict bindings already support a static 
configuration. I intend to add one to DerelictLua in the very 
near future. I've got a little tool that can convert 
Derelict-style function pointer declarations into standard 
function declarations for a static binding, so yeah, it's easy to 
do.