debugging mixins

Manu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Oct 2 19:44:37 PDT 2016


On 3 October 2016 at 00:08, Ethan Watson via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 October 2016 at 05:00:07 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>
>> We should create a file where the string-mixins are expanded, I agree.
>
>
> Further to this. I tried generating .di files the other day for code based
> on Binderoo. None of the mixins were expanded, which resulted in the
> compiler needing to do all that work again anyway and negating the effect of
> a precompiled library.
>
> If you get to doing that work, it would be fab if you could apply it to .di
> generation. If not as the default, then at least as a switch I can provide
> on the command line.

That's genius! :)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list