D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg

[Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d]

I also chose Ilya's nanomsg over zeromq, there were some fundamental flaws
in ZMQ that it addresses, and it is more flexible.

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 04:18:55 UTC, Nikolay wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:e
>>
>> Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg?
>>>
>>
>> Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now. See
>> http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other-stories/
>>
>
>
> Nanomsg is not dead.   The maintainer tried to introduce a code of conduct
> (about which even he was uncertain of the merits of), felt he didn't have
> the effective power to do so,  and then resigned in frustration.   A few
> weeks later he was back and it hit 1.0 recently.
> Had an exchange with Pieter on Reddit and after looking at commit
> history,  he took back his suggestion that Nanomsg was dead.
>
> It's silly to compare the two communities and make any inferences because
> Nanomsg has fewer people and the originator has a job and Google and many
> interests.
>
> There are deimos bindings that Ilya wrote for me and I open-sourced,  and
> a wrapper that I wrote that is also open sourced.  There are some bugs in
> the deimos binding - haven't yet had time to push my changes.
>
> The wrapper isn't super well tested but I use it.   Will make it more
> polished when I have more time.
>
>
> Laeeth
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20161005/b3cc7418/attachment.html>