New encryption block...

Era Scarecrow via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Oct 12 03:34:52 PDT 2016


On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 20:33:29 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
>  Something coming to mind is the idea of making a small 
> algorithm to be used with other already existing encryption 
> functions to extend the blocksize of encryption with minimal 
> complexity growth.

  For fun I'm experimenting with this. So far seems fairly 
promising, although I'm sure I'm writing it very insecurely. 
Maybe it would be better for random number generation rather than 
secure encryption? Not sure.

  Anyways, 16bit replacement, extending to 64bit via reordering, 
and 8 unique xor's between stages. Once I get the 576 block 
finished (1 for salt) I'll probably publish my ugly code for 
consideration and to be torn apart for security issues.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list