I close DIP27. I won't be pursuing DIPs anymore

[Joakim via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 13:02:20 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> I would say the better attitude to have is that you may not 
> expect results to always go your way, and put out your best 
> effort. If it doesn't work, that's the way it is, move on to 
> something more interesting and/or satisfying.

Also, consider the creator of C++'s recent 0/3 track record of 
getting his proposals into C++17:

http://www.cplusplus.com/forum/general/195226/#msg938814

I was surprised that even his scaled-back UFCS proposal didn't 
get in:

https://isocpp.org/blog/2016/02/a-bit-of-background-for-the-unified-call-proposal

Note the comments after the OP there: he wants full UFCS but will 
settle for at least one-way.  I guess even that didn't get in.