ddoc latex/formulas?

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Sep 15 07:40:24 PDT 2016

On 09/15/2016 10:15 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 September 2016 at 13:12:05 UTC, Manu wrote:
>> What does that mean? What's your process to produce this output?
> ./adrdox test.d
> The program internally runs pipeProcess over to latex to make the image
> when it sees the $(MATH ....) syntax.
>> Problem is, phobos uses vanilla ddoc... so we need that to do
>> everything we need.
> Yeah, that's why I forked phobos for my doc project too. Vanilla ddoc is
> a dead end.

Wait, but I just showed how with vanilla ddoc you can immediately use 
mathjax to do better than adrdox. No need for any pre/postprocessing or 
scripting, just one line of import. Could you please respond to that? -- 

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list