CTFE Status 2

[Moritz Maxeiner via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 15 April 2017 at 10:10:54 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 February 2017 at 21:05:51 UTC, Stefan Koch 
> wrote:
>> Hi Guys, due to the old CTFE status thread getting to page 30, 
>> I am now starting a new one.
>>
>> [...]
>
> The llvm backend is back in a fully working state.
> It's about 2times slower in my then my interpreter ;)

Huh. In all cases, or only in trivial ones? Because I would have 
expected the overhead of jitting to become less relevant the more 
complex stuff you interpret vs jit.