Maybe D is right about GC after all !

[codephantom]

On Thursday, 28 December 2017 at 10:54:08 UTC, Russel Winder 
wrote:
>
> If you want to believe that fine. Clearly you are missing the 
> point I am making, which clearly must be my fault for bad 
> expression. Also clear it is not worth progressing this debate.

You are asking Walter to 'quantify' something that simply does 
not need to be quantified. This is the problem with the 
scientific method.

Not everything needs to be, or can be, or should be, quantified.

Some things just make sense, and it is obvious, and it can be 
left at that.

Like not having to annotate functions with func, or fn.

Not having to use := when you mean =

etc..
etc....