Voting for std.experimental.checkedint

[Meta via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 12:39:38 UTC, Robert burner Schadek 
wrote:
> This is the voting thread to decide if the proposed addition to 
> Phobos, std.experimental.checkedint, should be accepted.
>
> To vote, please respond to this post. You have three options:
>
> * Yes
> * Yes with a single condition
> * No
>
> If you vote "yes" you can still mention something you'd like 
> improved, but please be explicit if that problem is a non 
> starter for you and you are choosing option two. If you vote 
> no, please state why, though you aren't required to.
>
> Some things to consider when making a vote:
>
> * Is this functionality needed in Phobos?
> * The API is practically permanent once the module is accepted. 
> Some minor changes can be made, but a full redesign is no 
> longer an option.
>
> The voting will end 2017-01-31
>
> The PR can be found here:
> https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/4613
>
> The dub package can be found here:
> http://code.dlang.org/packages/checkedint_andralex
>
> The review thread can be found here:
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/mnounbaobgphbmanfaks@forum.dlang.org

Yes, with the comment that this would probably be better as a Dub 
package, at least for the time being. If std.experimental didn't 
exist I would say no outright.