A safer File.readln

[TheGag96 via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 23 January 2017 at 13:18:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 1/23/17 5:44 AM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> If, instead of increasing its size by 100%, we increase it by 
>> a smaller
>> percentage of its previous size, we still maintain the 
>> amortized O(1)
>> cost (with a multiplier that might be a little higher, but see 
>> the trade
>> off). On the other hand, we can now reuse memory.
>
> Heh, I have a talk about it. The limit is the golden cut, 
> 1.6180339887498948482... The proof is fun. Anything larger 
> prevents you from reusing previously used space. -- Andrei

Andrei, could you link this talk? Thanks!