Isn't it about time for D3?

[Sebastien Alaiwan via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 11 June 2017 at 17:59:54 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> Guillaume Piolat wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, 10 June 2017 at 23:30:18 UTC, Liam McGillivray 
>> wrote:
>>> I realize that there are people who want to continue using D 
>>> as it is, but those people may continue to use D2.
>>
>> Well, no thanks.
>> The very same strategy halved the community for D1/D2 split 
>> and almost killed D.
>
> as you can see, D is alive and kicking, and nothing disasterous 
> or fatal happens.
Yes, but could it have been a lot more alive and kicking, hadn't 
we shot ourselves in the foot with this D1/D2 split?