Re: Isn't it about time for D3?

[ketmar via Digitalmars-d]

Sebastien Alaiwan wrote:

> On Sunday, 11 June 2017 at 17:59:54 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>> Guillaume Piolat wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, 10 June 2017 at 23:30:18 UTC, Liam McGillivray wrote:
>>>> I realize that there are people who want to continue using D as it is, 
>>>> but those people may continue to use D2.
>>>
>>> Well, no thanks.
>>> The very same strategy halved the community for D1/D2 split and almost 
>>> killed D.
>>
>> as you can see, D is alive and kicking, and nothing disasterous or fatal 
>> happens.
> Yes, but could it have been a lot more alive and kicking, hadn't we shot 
> ourselves in the foot with this D1/D2 split?

this question has no answer. can we do better if we will do everything 
right on the first try? of course!