Isn't it about time for D3?

[Sebastien Alaiwan via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 at 06:56:14 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> Sebastien Alaiwan wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, 11 June 2017 at 17:59:54 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>>> Guillaume Piolat wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, 10 June 2017 at 23:30:18 UTC, Liam McGillivray 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> I realize that there are people who want to continue using 
>>>>> D as it is, but those people may continue to use D2.
>>>>
>>>> Well, no thanks.
>>>> The very same strategy halved the community for D1/D2 split 
>>>> and almost killed D.
>>>
>>> as you can see, D is alive and kicking, and nothing 
>>> disasterous or fatal happens.
>> Yes, but could it have been a lot more alive and kicking, 
>> hadn't we shot ourselves in the foot with this D1/D2 split?
>
> this question has no answer. can we do better if we will do 
> everything right on the first try? of course!

My point precisely was that "not splitting D1/D2" might 
correspond to "doing things right".