What is the state of Microcontroller support in d?

[Dan Walmsley via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 00:50:35 UTC, Mike wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 June 2017 at 13:45:31 UTC, Mike wrote:
>
>> [...]
>
> The more I think about this, the more it seems like the best 
> approach.  All this time I've been trying to find a way to 
> build just enough runtime code to support the features I'm 
> using, and I've only encountered frustration.  It's a shame 
> that we have to build such a massive amount of infrastructure 
> just to get a build, only to have the linker strip it all away, 
> but apparently that's just the way things are.
>
> Forget -betterC and -no-rtti; embrace it all!  We might just be 
> be able to turn this lemon into lemonade afterall.
>
> I'm having a bit of a change of heart (or maybe there's 
> something in my coffee).  I'll be traveling overseas for the 
> next month, so when I return I'll revisit this and see if it 
> still appeals to me.
>
> Mike

When iv been using c++ on stm32 I have had to rely on gcsections 
to produce a workable binary.

Have a good holiday, ill try as much as I can to improve things 
in the mean time 😀