const(Class) is mangled as Class const* const

[kinke via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 28 March 2017 at 14:11:16 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> I understand you point and showed you why it isn't a mangling 
> problem at all, and gave you direction you may want to dig in 
> to make a proposal that may
actually get traction.

If you really did get my point, it should be clear that I don't 
see a necessity for differentiating between `const T` and 
`const(T)` on the D side in general, transitive const hasn't been 
an issue for my D/C++ interop use cases yet, but the 
const(Object) issue the OP arises would definitely be a show 
stopper at some point and, unlike a more general solution, can be 
trivially remedied.