Is it acceptable to not parse unittest blocks when unittests are disabled ?

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 30 March 2017 at 20:29:26 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 March 2017 at 17:22:20 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> SDC has the goal to be more principled.
>> And Not to be Mr. fast and loose, right ?
>> If a file parses it'd better be syntactically correct!
>> All of it.
>
> Just an idea, but could the solution for SDC be to enable 
> unittests by default, disabling them would be explicit? That 
> would sure make using it alot more principled that dmd, 
> regardless whether it syntax checks unittests when they are 
> disabled.

SDC uses an utility called sdunit to JIT the unittest. Right now, 
sdunit doesn't handle exceptions so its utility is limited, but 
it's getting there.