DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Round 1

[Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 09:03:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> 100% in favor of the constructor behavior change in case no 
> constructor is in the derived class.

I think we could even split this up into two separate proposals, 
because this part of the DIP is fairly non-controversial and 
could be approved much faster (and implementation-wise it should 
be fairly simple to support).