Note from a donor

[codephantom]

On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 03:55:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> I think that Adam has a valid point that there _are_ plenty of 
> applications that can function just fine as 32-bit, and given 
> how much easier it is to build for 32-bit on Windows with D, if 
> you don't need to interact with any 3rd party libraries built 
> with MS' compiler, then simply using the default 32-bit dmd 
> stuff on Windows could be just fine.
>

Yes. I agree. The point was valid, and it was not a point many 
would have dared argued .. so good on him ;-)

But progress is needed too.. 64bit is to 32bit, was D is to C.

A new world of possibilites await....