Project Elvis

[bauss]

On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 17:37:42 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 17:27:30 UTC, bauss wrote:
>> Which this operator has already proven to be in other 
>> successful languages.
>
> Not exactly this variation, but I get your point. On the other 
> hand, so has hundreds of other operators from other 
> languages... So which one should one not implement?
>
> Anyway, I've already shared my viewpoints on the flaws of "?:" 
> as proposed.

Yes. My point wasn't entirely for the addition of this operator, 
but in general for every good idea around here.

Honestly I don't care too much if it gets implemented or not. 
It'll be a great addition, but in my own opinion it's not life or 
death.