Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

Daniel Kozak kozzi11 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 21 13:47:17 UTC 2017


s'/sema/same/

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or without
> VibeManualMemoryManagement
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And it seems it is faster with GC. So removing VibeManualMemoryManagement
>> helped in some cases too.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> BTW: I have changed dub.json a little too:
>>>
>>> {
>>>     "name": "vibedtest",
>>>     "targetName": "vibedtest",
>>>     "targetType": "executable",
>>>     "targetPath": "bin",
>>>     "dependencies": {
>>>         "vibe-d": "~>0.8.2-alpha.1"
>>>     },
>>>     "subConfigurations": {"vibe-d": "libevent"},
>>>     "versions": [
>>>         "VibeManualMemoryManagement"
>>>     ],
>>>     "buildTypes": {
>>>         "release": { "buildOptions": ["releaseMode", "optimize",
>>> "inline"],
>>>                      "dflags-posix-ldc": ["-flto=thin",
>>> "-Xcc=-fuse-ld=gold"] }
>>>     }
>>> }
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d <
>>> digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:09:33 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> wrong version, this is my letest version:
>>>>> https://paste.ofcode.org/qWsQikdhKiAywgBpKwANFR
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>> Updated.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20170921/208decb7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list