Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?
Daniel Kozak
kozzi11 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 21 13:47:17 UTC 2017
s'/sema/same/
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or without
> VibeManualMemoryManagement
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And it seems it is faster with GC. So removing VibeManualMemoryManagement
>> helped in some cases too.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Kozak <kozzi11 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> BTW: I have changed dub.json a little too:
>>>
>>> {
>>> "name": "vibedtest",
>>> "targetName": "vibedtest",
>>> "targetType": "executable",
>>> "targetPath": "bin",
>>> "dependencies": {
>>> "vibe-d": "~>0.8.2-alpha.1"
>>> },
>>> "subConfigurations": {"vibe-d": "libevent"},
>>> "versions": [
>>> "VibeManualMemoryManagement"
>>> ],
>>> "buildTypes": {
>>> "release": { "buildOptions": ["releaseMode", "optimize",
>>> "inline"],
>>> "dflags-posix-ldc": ["-flto=thin",
>>> "-Xcc=-fuse-ld=gold"] }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d <
>>> digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:09:33 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> wrong version, this is my letest version:
>>>>> https://paste.ofcode.org/qWsQikdhKiAywgBpKwANFR
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>> Updated.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20170921/208decb7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list