named arguments (C++) - Something D could learn from
gooberman at gmail.com
Mon Dec 17 19:24:06 UTC 2018
On Sunday, 16 December 2018 at 22:16:28 UTC, Matthew OConnor
> I am a C++ developer by day and reading that article made me
> cringe. C++ has this creeping, expansive, everything ends up in
> the language or writable in it, if you accept awful messages
> and contorting the syntax. I hope D doesn't go down that route.
Sweet zombie Jesus I just read the article and wow I can't
believe that was written _this week_. Named arguments by defining
non-thread-safe statics? People write this tripe in 2018? And get
_good comments_ on it?
Something has gone very wrong in compsci education.
More information about the Digitalmars-d