named arguments (C++) - Something D could learn from
atila.neves at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 10:46:52 UTC 2018
On Monday, 17 December 2018 at 19:24:06 UTC, Ethan wrote:
> On Sunday, 16 December 2018 at 22:16:28 UTC, Matthew OConnor
>> I am a C++ developer by day and reading that article made me
>> cringe. C++ has this creeping, expansive, everything ends up
>> in the language or writable in it, if you accept awful
>> messages and contorting the syntax. I hope D doesn't go down
>> that route.
> Sweet zombie Jesus I just read the article and wow I can't
> believe that was written _this week_. Named arguments by
> defining non-thread-safe statics? People write this tripe in
> 2018? And get _good comments_ on it?
> Something has gone very wrong in compsci education.
At least the static variables are const...
More information about the Digitalmars-d