DIP 1016--ref T accepts r-values--Community Review Round 1

[rikki cattermole]

On 26/07/2018 12:40 AM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
> Just to be clear, I'm also against all the new proposed addition for, 
> named parameter, new struct initialisation and so on....

You'll go giddy once you hear about what I have planned after named 
parameters ;)

But seriously tho, just because a pattern of code can be done purely in 
library, doesn't mean it can't be done entirely better with a nice 
simple language feature which makes it considerably easier to learn and 
understand.

We do have to be careful, that we only try to go after features which 
are fairly well proven to our existing code and not for a theoretical 
improvement.