A breach of immutability due to memory implicit conversions to immutable without synchronisation, maybe??

[Kagamin]

On Monday, 12 November 2018 at 13:17:09 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> The first one is definitely not allowed, I'm not worried about 
> that. But is it actually forbidden for the MODIFY to happen 
> after atomicStore?

Well, the topic is a little abstract, 
https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/atomic/memory_order - but this 
description looks pretty decent, way better than whatever I saw 
before.