shared - i need it to be useful

[rikki cattermole]

On 22/10/2018 10:28 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 10/22/2018 1:34 AM, Manu wrote:
>> I posted it, twice... 2 messages, back to back, and you're responding
>> to this one, and not that one. I'll post it again...
> 
> 
> Posting it over and over is illustrative of the failure of posting 
> proposal documents to the n.g. instead of posting it as a DIP which can 
> be referred to:
> 
> 1. nobody knows which of your 70 messages are the ones with the proposal 
> in it
> 
> 2. with multiple posts of the proposal, nobody knows which one is the 
> most up-to-date one
> 
> Doing it this way does not work. Continuing to repost it is a waste of 
> your time. Post it as a DIP and link to it.

As I've said previously, it doesn't need to be a good DIP or anywhere 
near complete. It just needs code examples comparing current and 
proposed behavior with some text about semantics changes.