Scope modules DIP rough messy draft.

[Neia Neutuladh]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 23:17:36 +0000, 12345swordy wrote:
> On Saturday, 27 October 2018 at 22:51:15 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
>> This sounds like the perfect use case for a personal utility library.
> I consider that solution to be over engineering to me. Regardless I was
> using C# for creating the one time scripts in the past, not D.
> 
> Again it seems like people are missing the forest for the trees by
> focusing on the examples themselves rather then the underline argument
> that there are reasonable possible situations that the programmer find
> it easier to create file to that stores multiple modules then to create
> every file for every module.

You have a tool in mind to address a narrow set of circumstances. It would 
be useful. But we do already have tools to address the same circumstances. 
Not quite as well, but they're already here. And D is already a very 
complex language with a lot for people to learn, so any new changes have to 
be pretty valuable to be justified.

The way we justify changes is by looking at examples to see what existing 
features don't allow or only allow awkwardly, and then comparing with how 
the proposed change would make them work.