Updating D beyond Unicode 2.0

[Shachar Shemesh]

On 27/09/18 16:38, aliak wrote:
> The point was that being able to use non-English in code is demonstrably 
> both helpful and useful to people. Norwegian happens to be easily 
> anglicize-able. I've already linked to non ascii code versions in a 
> previous post if you want that too.

If you wish to make a point about something irrelevant to the 
discussion, that's fine. It is, however, irrelevant, mostly because it 
is uncontested.

This thread is about the use of non-English in *identifiers*. This 
thread is not about comments. It is not about literals (i.e. - strings). 
Only about identifiers (function names, variable names etc.).

If you have real world examples of those, that would be both interesting 
and relevant.

Shachar