How do people feel about putting source compiler directives inside rdmd?
no at spam.net
Tue Dec 3 14:58:17 UTC 2019
On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 at 14:45:47 UTC, mipri wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 at 13:56:33 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 at 09:10:16 UTC, Petar Kirov
>> [ZombineDev] wrote:
>>> Instead of bashing it, I think this discussion could be more
>>> productive if you shared your criticism in a constrictive way.
>> There have been many, many long threads on this already.
> And it is merely technically *possible* to receive them. It's
> not easy, or convenient, or definitely going to happen. The
> retrieved conversation is not necessarily even useful to
> someone capable of taking action on any matters raised but not
> capable of telling, without unrelated efforts, which of the
> matters raised is even still relevant, or not obviated by later
> (as yet unearthed) conversation.
> If you don't put your words in a wiki or an issue you should
> better treat the conversation as if it happened in person and
> your words were lost to the wind. Teams of archaeologists are
> not available.
More information about the Digitalmars-d