DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Community Review Round 1

[Olivier FAURE]

On Wednesday, 27 February 2019 at 17:46:24 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> The proposal mentioned that having two @named functions with 
> same names and parameter types but different parameter names is 
> allowed.

No, it mentions that having two @named prototypes for the same 
functions with the same name and parameter types but different 
parameters is allowed.

eg: This is forbidden:

     @named:
     int foo(int x, int y) { return x + y; }
     int foo(int w, int z) { return w + z; }

and this is allowed:

     @named:
     int foo(int x, int y);
     int foo(int w, int z) { return y + z; }

The next iteration should probably make that distinction clearer.