[SAoC] 'DPP with Linux kernel headers' Project Thread
no at spam.net
Mon Nov 4 20:34:47 UTC 2019
On Monday, 4 November 2019 at 16:48:21 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> On Monday, 4 November 2019 at 09:17:57 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
>> On Sunday, 3 November 2019 at 16:37:36 UTC, Cristian Becerescu
>>> When encountering anonymous structs or unions, dpp gives them
>>> a name. And this forces dpp to declare a member of that
>>> 'now-named-anon' record type and also provide accessors for
>>> the 'now-named-anon' record (because unnamed records also
>>> implicitly declare a member of their type).
>> But the question is why is DPP generating named unions/structs
>> when D supports anonymous ones?
> Probably because I either didn't know that at the time but knew
> and forgot. I don't remember what I was trying to do or why
> just doing the obvious failed.
I don't know if this is related, but dpp ignored anonymous enums,
so it may have been the same issue.
More information about the Digitalmars-d