DIP 1025--Dynamic Arrays Only Shrink, Never Grow--Community Review Round 1
Jab
jab_293 at gmall.com
Tue Nov 12 17:09:30 UTC 2019
On Tuesday, 12 November 2019 at 12:30:42 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> This DIP in it's current form would cause so much damage that
> if we fall behind because we won't do it, so be it.
It is going to fall behind either way. This DIP focuses on
falling behind Rust/C++ safety with manual memory management. But
it completely ignores falling behind on simplicity/easy of
use/unrestricted use with other languages that have a GC. The
focus seems to only be on Rust/C++ lately. By trying to be safe
with manual memory management you lose what the GC offers, this
is in part due to the fact that GC pointers and malloc pointers
are indistinguishable. It's a clash between two different
ideologies that don't mix well.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list