Wanted: best way to express default expectations
dkorpel at gmail.com
Mon Oct 14 13:26:56 UTC 2019
On Monday, 14 October 2019 at 13:00:14 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> But I still think an `if_not`, `ifnot` or some similar keyword
> would have it's place. Does anybody agree? Read: might it be
> worth a DIP?
I think a new keyword for this has very little chance.
One related idea is making `if !(expression) statement` allowed
in the grammar (! outside parentheses) which makes it easier to
read fully negated if-statements. It hasn't been that well
More information about the Digitalmars-d