Feedback on Átila's Vision for D

[Atila Neves]

On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 18:34:01 UTC, Rumbu wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 17:40:42 UTC, Atila Neves 
> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 16:42:28 UTC, Rumbu wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 15 October 2019 at 13:09:15 UTC, Mike Parker 
>>> wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I will put this here: 
>>> https://rawgit.com/wilzbach/state-of-d/master/report.html
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Which parts of that survey would you like the vision to 
>> include?
>
> I already said that I don't endorse the list entirely, so my 
> personal opinion is irrelevant, lost somewhere between the 
> responses on the survey.
>
> But if you insist, I am personally disappointed about dub, 
> phobos organization and function names, missing features, IDE 
> integration, range syntax, OOP considered as a second-hand 
> citizen.

IDE integration seems to be a common refrain. I'm trying to 
understand what it is people need here by asking questions.

What is it about OOP in D that you find lacking?

Could you please expand on what you mean about "range syntax"?