Feedback on Átila's Vision for D
atila.neves at gmail.com
Thu Oct 17 12:51:17 UTC 2019
On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 18:34:01 UTC, Rumbu wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 17:40:42 UTC, Atila Neves
>> On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 16:42:28 UTC, Rumbu wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 15 October 2019 at 13:09:15 UTC, Mike Parker
>>> I will put this here:
>> Which parts of that survey would you like the vision to
> I already said that I don't endorse the list entirely, so my
> personal opinion is irrelevant, lost somewhere between the
> responses on the survey.
> But if you insist, I am personally disappointed about dub,
> phobos organization and function names, missing features, IDE
> integration, range syntax, OOP considered as a second-hand
IDE integration seems to be a common refrain. I'm trying to
understand what it is people need here by asking questions.
What is it about OOP in D that you find lacking?
Could you please expand on what you mean about "range syntax"?
More information about the Digitalmars-d