Feedback on Átila's Vision for D

[Aliak]

On Friday, 18 October 2019 at 07:56:26 UTC, drug wrote:
> On 10/17/19 11:48 PM, aliak wrote:
>> On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 18:00:39 UTC, Mike Parker 
>> wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 16:50:15 UTC, Rumbu wrote:
>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Private to the module *is* correct in D.
>>>
>>> http://dlang.org/blog/2018/11/06/lost-in-translation-encapsulation/
>> 
>> That's debatable: 
>> https://github.com/aliak00/d-isms/blob/master/da-faq/06-access-levels.md
>
> You complain that `doAmazingStuff` can access private members 
> of class A if this function and this class are placed together 
> in one module and continue complain that if you put that class 
> in its own module then `doAmazingStuff` now cannot access 
> private members of A and isn't a "first class" citizen of class 
> A. Could you explain you position clearly?

My position on what? No private access is the consequence of 
moving a function out of a module.