Feedback on Átila's Vision for D
something at something.com
Fri Oct 18 14:37:45 UTC 2019
On Friday, 18 October 2019 at 07:56:26 UTC, drug wrote:
> On 10/17/19 11:48 PM, aliak wrote:
>> On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 18:00:39 UTC, Mike Parker
>>> On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 16:50:15 UTC, Rumbu wrote:
>>> Private to the module *is* correct in D.
>> That's debatable:
> You complain that `doAmazingStuff` can access private members
> of class A if this function and this class are placed together
> in one module and continue complain that if you put that class
> in its own module then `doAmazingStuff` now cannot access
> private members of A and isn't a "first class" citizen of class
> A. Could you explain you position clearly?
My position on what? No private access is the consequence of
moving a function out of a module.
More information about the Digitalmars-d